I love how he's obsessed with fixing bots on Twitter, but not just fixing it, he has to fix it.

A normal person buying a company would react to a report saying the site's bot problem isn't as bad as expected with "oh, great, that frees up resources we don't have to allocate there". He reacted by firing the staff responsible in anger, bc if there weren't millions of bots for him to ban, spending all that money would be a waste. This is the management style of a guy who demands a rescue team ditch their equipment to use his sub midway through, and who said he could fix world hunger then rejected an itemized list of what he could spend money on to end some world hunger bc it wouldn't fix all of it

When Elon bought Twitter, he was given a report saying the bot problem wasn't as bad as he thought. He fired the people responsible and started declaring that he would solve the bot problem

Today, the majority of traffic on Twitter is now bots

ALT

It all makes sense, though, when you realize Elon is not only really stupid and bad at everything, but also he didn't even realize the bots on Twitter were bots, bc of course someone who surrounds himself with crypto shills was going to end up seeing the site's normal users as the suspect ones

He literally ran the site into the ground due to an obsessive need to "fix the bot problem", and he ended up creating the worst bot problem in the history of social media, over 73% worse than the next-worst site. And that's before you consider the possibility that big brain genius Elon Musk is trying to fix Twitter's ad revenue problem by making bots that engage with ads. Incredible

Fave part of this, from the story itself, is that the cybersecurity firm monitoring this almost refused to publish the data, bc they didn't believe it could really be that bad

Apparently, before he did all this, the number of bots last year at the same time was...2.81%. That was the number Elon was desperate to fix, and he turned 2% into 75%

Found a picture of the stage setup with the UV lights

The contractor who set up the lights used bulbs that emit uv-c light, which is mostly used for sterilization

I did a quick search for the bulbs and almost every result mentions sterilization or germicide, I have to assume it's impossible to purchase these, (in bulk! enough to light a stage!) without knowing that they're for killing living organisms.

Link to an article about it

#fucking INSANE#i'd love to be like ''lol they deserve it'' but this is such a fucked up thing to do to a captive audience????#also love how the one guy is like ''ur good guys so u'll do the right thing and make a statement... right? :)''#but fr this is so fucked up i hope they use all their crypto bro money to sue the hell out of the event organizers

Yeah I don't think this is something anyone reasonably deserves. I mean, we can roll our eyes at people dumb enough to pour all their money into the Stupidest Scam Ever, but I think 'the lights at this concert meet basic safety standards' is a reasonable assumption for anyone to make. I don't interrogate the people at my local cinema about what kind of UV lights they have, I just assume they're using normal ones that won't send me blind. That guy up there is being weirdly forgiving of these penny-pinching arseholes ("you're good guys" THEY BLINDED YOU AND YOUR FRIENDS WITH THE STUPIDEST SAFETY VIOLATION POSSIBLE) but this one's entirely on the organisers.

Of course, the really stupid thing would be if they're too addicted to the taste of boot leather to organise a class action lawsuit. They better sue. The organisers should be paying every cent of lost work, general suffering and medical care costs.

#a) how does this happen and b) why don't other situations with uv lights do this?#like i used to go to laser tag that had uv lights and we were fine?#or maybe that's black lights and it's different???#idk whatever the thing is that makes white clothes glow in the dark

They used a different kind of UV light, one for sterilising things. It emits a kind of UV that kills living tissue.

I don't know the details of the situation but I've heard people speculate that production of these sterilising lights was ramped up due to an expected surge in sales (due to Covid) that never materialised, so these guys probably went "oh sweet, incredibly cheap surplus UV lights someone's offloading" and did no further research on the matter. I have no idea how true that is, though.

Quick bit of info UV ranges from 100-400nm in wavelength, the shorter the wave the more energy the longer the less energy, and the closer to visible light, like so:

‘Normal’ UV lights (aka black lights) are UVA, and usually towards the longer end. If you spent enough time under a black light it would cause tissue damage!

In fact that’s how tanning beds work, by using UV light to damage your skin until it produces melanin giving you a ‘tan’(oversimplification). In the long term that cumulative damage leads to skin cancer.

UVB is the next step up in energy, starting here you can damage your DNA directly. Most sunburns are actually caused by this wavelength.

Now we hit UVC. UVC has the highest energy wave! BUT it’s usually filtered out by our atmosphere. We are exposed to comparatively little UVC, which is good because UVC is very damaging to your DNA.

The specifics of why are very interesting but I won’t get into it. The general of it is that it causes your DNA to make mistakes, and those mistakes cause cancer. To the extent that labs can, and do, use UVC lamps to study cancer.

The reason UVC sterilized against viruses and bacteria is that it bombards and mutates their DNA until they loose their microscopic minds (DNA integrity).

This is why ALL UVC sterilization lights come with the warning “don’t use on eyes or skin!” because if not they could be suuuuuuuued BIG SUED. like Sue the T-Rex size sue, if you did and got cancer.

So I’m conclusion these guys should not just sue for time lost now, and pain and suffering now, but also for future likelihood of cancer.

While a couple hours exposure doesn’t seem like a long time, the fact that they show such strong symptoms of tissue damage…. It would not be surprising if a number of these people developed skin or eye cancer later on.

Hmm this did not end up being a quick bit of info at all

oh lmaooo it got flagged for being an ad by adblocker