I’d love to say “I’m not watching this” but i see Jack Black dressed like a Safari Man and I can feel my wallet struggling to open inside my jeans

please help theres nothing in there but cobwebs and a single canadian quarter I cannot afford this

I’m sorry I can’t. No Robin Williams, no board games, wtf is the point of this shit?

I hate these kinds of headlines: technically correct, but (intentionally?) misleading. 

I haven’t read this particular article, but I have been following the coverage coming out of CinemaCon. No, this reboot (which is implied to be a straight-up sequel, like Jurassic World) does not involve the same magical board game from the Robin Williams flick. Instead, the heroes (four high school stereotypes) get sucked into a cursed video game, and have to fight their way through the jungle while trapped inside the bodies of the playable characters they selected.

So it’s not just Jack Black dressed like a Safari Man. It’s Jack Black playing a “popular girl” inhabiting the digital avatar of a Safari Man. It’s not the exact same premise as the original, but I think it captures the spirit of it. And it’s not like Jumanji is some cinematic sacred cow (as much as I loved it when it was first released)–at worst, this one’ll be a guilty pleasure.

Tl;dr: Don’t trust super vague headlines. In fact, can glaring omissions be considered libel?

This actually isn’t even a reboot, it’s being classified as a sequel from the information I found. Hell, it’s also called Jumanji 2.

Idk about you guys but I’m so down for this???